Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated __tablename__-setting logic. #20

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2015

Conversation

seth-p
Copy link
Contributor

@seth-p seth-p commented Mar 29, 2015

No description provided.

@seth-p seth-p force-pushed the should_set_tablename branch 20 times, most recently from 9bb96ee to fde58e4 Compare March 30, 2015 05:57
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.12%) to 99.88% when pulling fde58e4 on seth-p:should_set_tablename into e7ca049 on dgilland:develop.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.12%) to 99.88% when pulling fde58e4 on seth-p:should_set_tablename into e7ca049 on dgilland:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.12%) to 99.88% when pulling f64376f on seth-p:should_set_tablename into e7ca049 on dgilland:develop.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.12%) to 99.88% when pulling f64376f on seth-p:should_set_tablename into e7ca049 on dgilland:develop.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling a62adf0 on seth-p:should_set_tablename into e7ca049 on dgilland:develop.

dgilland added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2015
Updated __tablename__-setting logic.
@dgilland dgilland merged commit 7883dcb into dgilland:develop Mar 31, 2015
@dgilland
Copy link
Owner

Solid! Thanks!

@seth-p seth-p deleted the should_set_tablename branch March 31, 2015 04:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants