-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update reservedIdentifiers #1473
Conversation
* Add `missing` and `assert` * Reformat them to match the grammar
dhall/src/Dhall/Syntax.hs
Outdated
, "Sort" | ||
|
||
-- Technically just an `operator` | ||
, "forall" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure whether forall
should be added to the keyword
rule.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I would have expected to see forall
in the keyword section of the standard grammar (even for the Unicode version: ∀
), rather than the operator section. Maybe the standard needs to be fixed
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe the standard needs to be fixed
dhall/src/Dhall/Syntax.hs
Outdated
, "Sort" | ||
|
||
-- Technically just an `operator` | ||
, "forall" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I would have expected to see forall
in the keyword section of the standard grammar (even for the Unicode version: ∀
), rather than the operator section. Maybe the standard needs to be fixed
missing
andassert