Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accessing fastq files from raw uBiome zips #11

Closed
vsaraswathula opened this issue Oct 24, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Accessing fastq files from raw uBiome zips #11

vsaraswathula opened this issue Oct 24, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@vsaraswathula
Copy link
Collaborator

I am having trouble accessing the fastq files that are in the raw uBiome zip files. Using standard file extraction doesn't work because unzipping XXXXX.zip will produce XXXXX.zip.cpgz. Attempting to open XXXXX.zip.cpgz produces another XXXXX.zip file, leading to a frustrating cycle.

In the "fastq" branch of the repository, there are fastq.gz files for forward and reverse reads that I was able to open and analyze in R, so there must be a way to access these files--I just cannot figure it out.

@dhimmel
Copy link
Owner

dhimmel commented Oct 24, 2018

Interesting. I've never heard of this issue, but it seems like it could occur from a variety of problems. My guess is that the files you're accessing in the master branch are not actually zip files. Instead they are text files with the Git LFS files information.

Git LFS is what we use for "large file storage". If you don't have it installed on your computer, I think that you may have ended up downloading a text file rather than the actual binary zip archive. If you install git LFS and then clone the repository, I am hoping that fixes the issue.

@vsaraswathula
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This did indeed fix the issue! I installed git LFS and have accessed the forward and reverse reads in the master branch's zips. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants