New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Registering samples on the uBiome Explorer #5
Comments
Downloaded from the uBiome Explorer. See #5 The kit/tube to ssr id mapping is not yet known (although can be deduced at download time). Track .zip files with Git LFS, attempt to use GitLab LFS.
Downloaded from the uBiome Explorer. See #5 The kit/tube to ssr id mapping is not yet known (although can be deduced at download time). Track .zip files with Git LFS. Use GitLab LFS, which offers sufficient free tier LFS storage for this project, rather than GitHub LFS as the LFS server. Created a mirror of the repository on GitLab for this purpose at: https://gitlab.com/dhimmel/fratjuice
@eliesbik I'm wondering what identifier system uBiome uses for tubes. This will allow us to more easily translate between our kit/tube information and specific samples. From downloading the data in the explorer (see #6), it looks like our ten tubes have the following IDs:
When I export taxonomy data as JSON, I see a line like: "sequencing_revision": "300987", So perhaps these identifiers are called Right now
|
Regarding my above questions about identifiers, the spreadsheet provided by @eliesbik in #7 appears to contain the relevant information (and more)! Specifically the
A few questions @eliesbik to make sure I understand all the identifiers:
|
Happy to answer your questions @dhimmel !
Yes |
Downloaded from the uBiome Explorer. See #5 The kit/tube to ssr id mapping is not yet known (although can be deduced at download time). Track .zip files with Git LFS. Use GitLab LFS, which offers sufficient free tier LFS storage for this project, rather than GitHub LFS as the LFS server. Created a mirror of the repository on GitLab for this purpose at: https://gitlab.com/dhimmel/fratjuice
Downloaded from the uBiome Explorer. See #5 The kit/tube to ssr id mapping is not yet known (although can be deduced at download time). Track .zip files with Git LFS. Use GitLab LFS, which offers sufficient free tier LFS storage for this project, rather than GitHub LFS as the LFS server. Created a mirror of the repository on GitLab for this purpose at: https://gitlab.com/dhimmel/fratjuice
Downloaded from the uBiome Explorer. See #5 The kit/tube to ssr id mapping is not yet known (although can be deduced at download time). Track .zip files with Git LFS. Use GitLab LFS, which offers sufficient free tier LFS storage for this project, rather than GitHub LFS as the LFS server. Created a mirror of the repository on GitLab for this purpose at: https://gitlab.com/dhimmel/fratjuice
I messaged Elies regarding the status of our samples. It turns out, according to Elies, uBiome processed the samples on 2017-10-11! She wrote:
It didn't occur to me to register these kits in the Explorer, which is why I didn't notice the processing was complete. So I just registered the samples in the Explorer now on 2017-12-13.
Methods
I clicked on "Activate Kit" and entered the kit info from
kits.tsv
. For each sample (kit-tube pair), I entered the date as 2017-07-20 (for when @bemert transferred the samples into the uBiome tubes, see #2 (comment)). Then I changed the sample type to custom from gut/spare. Custom is documented as:In the notes section, I added the sample information. This was a manual process, so I was careful not to make errors. Elies sent me some data, which we can use in the future to confirm that our sample-to-tube assignments are in concordance.
Here is a screenshot of the 10 samples on the uBiome Explorer:
Note that we have data on both the concentrated and unconcentrated preparations, which hopefully will provide some comforting redundancy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: