Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add primitives for arrows #73

Closed
rpglover64 opened this issue Feb 7, 2013 · 7 comments
Closed

Add primitives for arrows #73

rpglover64 opened this issue Feb 7, 2013 · 7 comments

Comments

@rpglover64
Copy link

They are commonly used and annoying to construct manually.

A stop-gap measure could be to add documentation detailing how to construct them, but I think that would be more work than actually adding the primitives.

I try to view diagrams as a competitor with tikz, and I find it disappointing that tikz wins here by such a large margin.

@byorgey
Copy link
Member

byorgey commented Feb 7, 2013

Thanks for opening this ticket! We've long known this is a huge missing feature and are actively working towards it. e.g. see #71, and some notes on the wiki here: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Diagrams/Dev/Arrows . I want to "do it right" and there are some tricky issues to consider.

@rpglover64
Copy link
Author

I do appreciate the "do it right" mentality, and I am unsurprised that there is active dev work (I'll check it out soon), but I was surprised at a lack of an issue; I didn't find the wiki page, so hopefully this report will make it easier to find for people in the future.

@byorgey
Copy link
Member

byorgey commented Feb 7, 2013

I agree! Hence my thanks for the ticket. =)

@rpglover64
Copy link
Author

And thank you for developing and maintaining the library :)

@byorgey
Copy link
Member

byorgey commented Jul 16, 2013

Note this is currently being worked on in the arrows branch, https://github.com/diagrams/diagrams-lib/tree/arrows . Right now we are aiming to include this in the 0.7.1 release.

@jeffreyrosenbluth
Copy link
Member

should this issue be closed ?

@byorgey
Copy link
Member

byorgey commented Sep 17, 2013

Yes! Closing via @26b7fdf .

@byorgey byorgey closed this as completed Sep 17, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants