New module enabling nice syntax for constructing and pattern-matching literal points and vectors

[byorgey]

No description provided.

[mgsloan]

Awesome! I like it! It's impressive how few libraries use (&). fgl, llvm, hmatrix, has, etc. These are all pretty special-purpose, so I think that's fine.

[fryguybob]

As soon as I saw the patch I wanted to use it :D. It all looks good to me. It seems like it might make the error messages for small point vs vector type mix ups slightly worse, especially if the mistake of expecting (&) to have the same prescience and syntactic support as (,). I think the way through this is to build more compelling high level ways to build paths that do not require talking about specific coordinates as much.

[byorgey]

Just giving this a bump -- as I explained in a previous email I'd like for the standard workflow to be that one generally doesn't merge one's own pull requests. So if both of you are happy with the current state of these commits, then one of you should merge them. (There's no rush though, just making sure we're on the same page.)

[fryguybob]

I was going to merge this morning, but I don't have my github password
at work :(. I'll see if I can do it through my ssh key.

Ryan

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Brent Yorgey
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

Just giving this a bump -- as I explained in a previous email I'd like for the standard workflow to be that one generally doesn't merge one's own pull requests. So if both of you are happy with the current state of these commits, then one of you should merge them. (There's no rush though, just making sure we're on the same page.)

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1 (comment)