Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved documentation for dials.estimate_resolution #1493

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 12, 2020

Conversation

rjgildea
Copy link
Contributor

  • Add command line documentation and examples
  • Include in sphinx website docs

* Add command line documentation and examples
* Include in sphinx website docs
@rjgildea rjgildea requested a review from dagewa November 11, 2020 22:07
Copy link
Member

@dagewa dagewa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great thanks 👍

rjgildea and others added 2 commits November 11, 2020 23:07
Co-authored-by: David Waterman <dagewa@users.noreply.github.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1493 (2af73e1) into master (a583e91) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1493   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.57%   65.57%           
=======================================
  Files         614      614           
  Lines       68956    68956           
  Branches     9519     9519           
=======================================
  Hits        45219    45219           
+ Misses      21898    21897    -1     
- Partials     1839     1840    +1     

@rjgildea rjgildea merged commit 4572f54 into master Nov 12, 2020
@rjgildea rjgildea deleted the estimate_resolution_docs branch November 12, 2020 13:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants