Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Label rlp #1614

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 7, 2021
Merged

Label rlp #1614

merged 7 commits into from
Mar 7, 2021

Conversation

dagewa
Copy link
Member

@dagewa dagewa commented Feb 26, 2021

To aid orientation and reflection matching between the reciprocal lattice and image viewers, this change introduces optional labelling for the reciprocal lattice point nearest the view centre.
Screenshot from 2021-02-26 16-55-22

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1614 (3439537) into main (a8710a8) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 9.37%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1614      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.61%   66.59%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         614      614              
  Lines       68771    68803      +32     
  Branches     9574     9578       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        45813    45816       +3     
- Misses      21027    21056      +29     
  Partials     1931     1931              

Base automatically changed from master to main March 1, 2021 11:12
Copy link
Contributor

@toastisme toastisme left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tested using SACLA-MPCCD-Phase3-21528-5images.h5 after running dials.import and dials.find_spots. Behaviour looks correct and visualises already existing code (nearest neighbours), so more tests aren't needed. Definitely a helpful change. Looks like build errors are just from the master/main change.

@Anthchirp
Copy link
Member

Yes, merging main into here should fix that.

@dagewa dagewa merged commit 918f031 into main Mar 7, 2021
@dagewa dagewa deleted the label-rlp branch March 7, 2021 17:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants