Try best practices with non-standard evaluation

[dieghernan]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 99.28% // Head: 99.27% // Decreases project coverage by -0.00% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (2a25557) compared to base (11f7217).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

❗ Current head 2a25557 differs from pull request most recent head a564729. Consider uploading reports for the commit a564729 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #63      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.28%   99.27%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines        1672     1663       -9     
==========================================
- Hits         1660     1651       -9     
  Misses         12       12              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
R/geom_spat_contour.R	98.01% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
R/geom_spat_contour_fill.R	94.18% <100.00%> (-0.14%)	⬇️
R/geom_spatraster.R	98.48% <100.00%> (-0.05%)	⬇️
R/geom_spatraster_rgb.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.