-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sub-detail fixes #2303
Open
shubham1g5
wants to merge
2
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
subDetailFixes
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
sub-detail fixes #2303
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -73,11 +73,9 @@ public void setRoot(ViewGroup root) { | |
|
||
mMenu = root.findViewById(R.id.tabbed_detail_menu); | ||
mViewPager = root.findViewById(R.id.tabbed_detail_pager); | ||
mViewPager.setId(AndroidUtil.generateViewId()); | ||
|
||
mViewPageTabStrip = root.findViewById(R.id.pager_tab_strip); | ||
|
||
mViewPager.setOnPageChangeListener(new ViewPager.OnPageChangeListener() { | ||
mViewPager.addOnPageChangeListener(new ViewPager.OnPageChangeListener() { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. no-op change since |
||
|
||
@Override | ||
public void onPageSelected(int position) { | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this already has an id set in xml and setting dynamic ids result in fragment not getting re-attached to the activity.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. It seems really strange that the original line was set at all, do you have a sense of what was trying to be accomplished with it? The only reason I can think you'd set the ID manually would be if you intended to have two ViewPagers within the same Activity.
I went back to check on the git blames and it does look like that is explicitly why that change was made:
d2eab7c
The only context where I can think this occurs is with persistent case tiles which do have their own view pager. The previous commit from the one I linked above is
a5b7f23
which does discuss persistent case tiles, and it's in the persistent case tile PR
#81
I think the key thing to test is loading a case list screen with a view pager, along with a persistent case tile that has its own view pager. I think both end up in the same general view hierarchy, so they need distinct ID's just based on how the views work but it's possible that other refactors have made that unecessary.