New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: Implement NDC from Yeh2019 #3156
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Regarding testing, I'd suggest testing that correlation between a signal and itself is 1, maybe with different sets of b-vectors and b-values. Maybe also that this correlation doesn't change if one of the signals is scaled. For smoke testing, worth testing with different gradient schemes, with and without b=0, for example.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3156 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 82.17% 82.40% +0.23%
==========================================
Files 150 151 +1
Lines 21271 21306 +35
Branches 3413 3417 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 17479 17558 +79
+ Misses 2950 2908 -42
+ Partials 842 840 -2
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also there is no automatic module discovery.
So, this new file needs to be added in meson.build
.
Thank you for this. Personally, I need to read the paper
Hello @mattcieslak, Thank you for updating ! Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. 🍻 Comment last updated at 2024-04-01 13:34:08 UTC |
should be good for review! |
LGTM! |
Looks great! Thanks for this @mattcieslak ! -- Not sure if I don't want people to miss this utility, just because they did not look in the right place. Alternative modules could be |
Is there any additional comment @arokem @ShreyasFadnavis or @araikes?? I think this PR is ready to get in. |
Thank you for this @mattcieslak ! |
Adds a function to address #3154.
What would you recommend to add for a test?