Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement transaction.atomic in django 1.4/1.5 way #3227

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 4, 2014

Conversation

yakky
Copy link
Member

@yakky yakky commented Jun 4, 2014

Fix #3062
Implements a wrapper to make every supported version happy.

This is required by #3222

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 4, 2014

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.08%) to 88.06% when pulling dbc6494 on yakky:feature/atomic into a8df328 on divio:develop.

@yakky
Copy link
Member Author

yakky commented Jun 4, 2014

@digi604 does this look to you a sane way to implement fallback for older djangos?

@digi604
Copy link
Contributor

digi604 commented Jun 4, 2014

lgtm

digi604 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2014
Implement transaction.atomic in django 1.4/1.5 way
@digi604 digi604 merged commit 0bf384b into django-cms:develop Jun 4, 2014
@yakky yakky mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2014
@yakky yakky deleted the feature/atomic branch November 8, 2014 22:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

replace commit_on_succes by atomic
3 participants