-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Form styles #339
Form styles #339
Conversation
vxsx
commented
May 18, 2016
- Fixes broken styles on forms in IE
- Fixes broken sortedm2m related-widget
- Fixes broken sortedm2m checkboxes in IE
- Removes djangocms-admin-frontend.css
wasn't used and caused document.write on every request in sideframe
fixes incorrect sizing in forms in IE, fixes sortedm2m, fixes checkbox positioning
@@ -792,6 +811,10 @@ form select[multiple] { | |||
width: calc(100% - 91px) !important; | |||
margin-right: 10px; | |||
} | |||
select + .related-widget-wrapper-link, | |||
.related-widget-wrapper-link + .related-widget-wrapper-link { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
eh..
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as I understand we do not have influence on html, because such selector are too heave and looks weird a bit
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we do not, exactly.
but it's a very valid adjacent selector :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ofcourse valid :)
overall LGTM |
👍 |