-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add GET {aggregator_api}/ → AggregatorApiConfig #1646
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
3 times, most recently
from
July 26, 2023 22:08
1afc43c
to
4b6799c
Compare
jbr
commented
Jul 26, 2023
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
9 times, most recently
from
July 27, 2023 18:56
7a1abd5
to
3eb378d
Compare
inahga
reviewed
Jul 27, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice job overall, some minor comments
inahga
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2023
divergentdave
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2023
tgeoghegan
requested changes
Jul 28, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Needs a rebase and some compilation error fixes but looks sound
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
from
July 28, 2023 19:46
822bd37
to
59ccd7e
Compare
Co-authored-by: David Cook <divergentdave@gmail.com>
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
from
July 28, 2023 21:15
0797a23
to
991b894
Compare
tgeoghegan
approved these changes
Jul 28, 2023
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
2 times, most recently
from
July 28, 2023 22:26
2d352c7
to
9f910cf
Compare
jbr
force-pushed
the
aggregator-api-config-route
branch
from
July 28, 2023 23:25
9f910cf
to
6dd7f76
Compare
inahga
reviewed
Jul 31, 2023
tgeoghegan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 31, 2023
With the latest `divviup-api` and `janus` changes ([1], [2]), we no longer tell `divviup-api` what DAP roles an aggregator supports nor the URL of its DAP API. Those configuration items are instead discovered during aggregator pairing. This updates the `divviup-api` client used in the `in-cluster` integration tests accordingly. [1]: #1646 [2]: divviup/divviup-api#340
tgeoghegan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 1, 2023
With the latest `divviup-api` and `janus` changes ([1], [2]), we no longer tell `divviup-api` what DAP roles an aggregator supports nor the URL of its DAP API. Those configuration items are instead discovered during aggregator pairing. This updates the `divviup-api` client used in the `in-cluster` integration tests accordingly. [1]: #1646 [2]: divviup/divviup-api#340
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pairs with divviup/divviup-api#340
Explanation of changes:
Box::pin(async {})
was replaced withBox::pin(std::future::ready(()))