Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use more specific asserts instead of the generic assertEqual #730

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 18, 2017

Conversation

atombrella
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 18, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #730 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #730   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   69.98%   69.98%           
=======================================
  Files          89       89           
  Lines        4425     4425           
=======================================
  Hits         3097     3097           
  Misses       1328     1328

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update aeac46d...2988c46. Read the comment docs.

@benjaoming
Copy link
Member

All looks good and passes tests (or rather the tests still work) - thanks! :)

@benjaoming benjaoming merged commit ce88873 into django-wiki:master Nov 18, 2017
@atombrella atombrella deleted the assert_optimizations branch November 19, 2017 08:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants