Fixed a couple of chained filter tests that weren't demonstrating wha…

…t they

claimed (since the "cut" filter's behaviour had changed since I originally
wrote those tests).


git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@6684 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37

tests/regressiontests/templates/filters.py

@@ -213,10 +213,10 @@ def get_filter_tests():
 
         # Force to safe, then back (also showing why using force_escape too
         # early in a chain can lead to unexpected results).
-        'chaining07': ('{{ a|force_escape|cut:"b" }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; "),
-        'chaining08': ('{% autoescape off %}{{ a|force_escape|cut:"b" }}{% endautoescape %}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; "),
-        'chaining09': ('{{ a|cut:"b"|force_escape }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; "),
-        'chaining10': ('{% autoescape off %}{{ a|cut:"b"|force_escape }}{% endautoescape %}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; "),
+        'chaining07': ('{{ a|force_escape|cut:";" }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &amp;lt b"),
+        'chaining08': ('{% autoescape off %}{{ a|force_escape|cut:";" }}{% endautoescape %}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt b"),
+        'chaining09': ('{{ a|cut:";"|force_escape }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; b"),
+        'chaining10': ('{% autoescape off %}{{ a|cut:";"|force_escape }}{% endautoescape %}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; b"),
         'chaining11': ('{{ a|cut:"b"|safe }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a < "),
         'chaining12': ('{% autoescape off %}{{ a|cut:"b"|safe }}{% endautoescape %}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a < "),
         'chaining13': ('{{ a|safe|force_escape }}', {"a": "a < b"}, "a &lt; b"),