Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
mu4e.texi: add compose-reply-wide-or-not-please-ask example
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@djcb
djcb committed Mar 18, 2024
1 parent 7e89e37 commit e220b71
Showing 1 changed file with 13 additions and 0 deletions.
13 changes: 13 additions & 0 deletions mu4e/mu4e.texi
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1672,6 +1672,19 @@ that, you can set (or @t{let}-bind) @t{message-cite-function} to
See @ref{(message) Reply} and @ref{(message) Wide Reply} for further
information.

Note: in older versions, @t{mu4e-compose-reply} would @emph{ask} whether you
want to reply-to-all or not; if you are nostalgic for that old behavior, you
could add something like the following to your configuration:
@lisp
(defun compose-reply-wide-or-not-please-ask ()
"Ask whether to reply-to-all or not."
(interactive)
(mu4e-compose-reply (yes-or-no-p "Reply to all?")))
(define-key mu4e-compose-minor-mode-map (kbd "R")
#'compose-reply-wide-or-not-please-ask)
@end lisp

@subsection Forward

You can forward some existing message with @t{mu4e-compose-forward} (with
Expand Down

2 comments on commit e220b71

@bderembl
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@djcb
One killer feature of the old behavior was to not have this question in case there was only one sender.
This is really a detail. just a matter of new habits

@djcb
Copy link
Owner Author

@djcb djcb commented on e220b71 Mar 19, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@djcb One killer feature of the old behavior was to not have this question in case there was only one sender. This is really a detail. just a matter of new habits

Yeah, that part is not easy to do with the new gnus-based composition unless gnus has something for that already. Oh well!

Please sign in to comment.