Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Issue 23946 - spec states "there can only be one destructor" #3636

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

ntrel
Copy link
Contributor

@ntrel ntrel commented Jun 10, 2023

...which can be confusing because of mixin templates

…structor"

...which can be confusing because of mixin templates
@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @ntrel! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
23946 normal specifications state that "there can only be one destructor" which can be confusing because of mixin templates

$(P There can be only one destructor per class, the destructor
does not have any parameters,
$(P There can be only one destructor declared per class, although
other destructors $(DDSUBLINK spec/template-mixin, destructors, can be mixed in).
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this intentional behavior?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but it was never written. Destructors of member variables are all called alongside the declared one, and a mixin template is a special kind of member. It is basically an embedded struct with its names exposed to the top level scope.

@dkorpel dkorpel merged commit aa232e2 into dlang:master Jun 12, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants