Fix Issue 12434 - std.algorithm.sum of immutable array too #2071
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM |
| unittest | ||
| { | ||
| immutable a = [10, 20]; | ||
| auto s1 = sum(a); // Error |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Out of context the comments will look weird, I suggest adding // 12434.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oops, sorry. Yeah, I usually reference the bug number when doing such copy pastes. I guess I forgot this time. Fixed.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12434 Simply uses the inference's `Unqual` type as a seed, rather than the straight up result. Also add some unittesting while at it.
|
Auto-merge toggled on |
ghost
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2014
Fix Issue 12434 - std.algorithm.sum of immutable array too
ghost
merged commit 
|
Thanks. |
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12434
Simply uses the inference's
Unqualtype as a seed, rather than the straight up result.Also add some unittesting while at it.