Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Issue 18051 - missing enum support in formattedRead/unformatValue #8345

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 31, 2021

Conversation

wolframw
Copy link
Contributor

@wolframw wolframw commented Dec 29, 2021

No description provided.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @wolframw! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.


If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Auto-close Bugzilla Severity Description
18051 enhancement missing enum support in formattedRead/unformatValue

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + phobos#8345"

text("Wrong unformat specifier '%", spec , "' for ", T.stringof));

return parse!T(input);
}
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While implementing this, I found that the unformatValue implementation for ordinary arrays and for associative arrays is identical and can be reused for enums too - that's why the diff shows a removed function.


Op op;
Op[] ops;
assert(formattedRead!"%s [%(%s, %)]"("lt [lt, gt, eq]", op, ops) == 2);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not the simpler test in the issue description instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a leftover from when I wasn't sure if the same implementation works for arrays and enums (and arrays of enums). I'll change it to the simpler test case.

@dlang-bot dlang-bot merged commit 4687883 into dlang:master Dec 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
3 participants