Fix OpenSSL error with servers that do unsafe renegotiation #19
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dlenski
reviewed
Jun 11, 2022
dlenski
reviewed
Jun 11, 2022
Allow servers that do not support the Renegotiation Indication Extension (RFC 5746) and are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks (CVE-2009-3555). Since we merely run tests, risks remain limited. (DRL fixed error if TLS version is unspecified, and added '@SECLEVEL=0')
dlenski
approved these changes
Jun 11, 2022
dlenski
changed the title
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allow servers that do not support the Renegotiation Indication Extension (RFC 5746) and are vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks (CVE-2009-3555).
Since we merely run tests, risks remain limited.
Fixes #5.