Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does it produce same output as Berkley Parser ? #2

Closed
kk00ss opened this issue Jan 6, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Does it produce same output as Berkley Parser ? #2

kk00ss opened this issue Jan 6, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@kk00ss
Copy link

kk00ss commented Jan 6, 2015

Hello, I'm interested in using your library.
As It's (currently) designed for use with grammars trained with the Berkeley Parser - I assume Puck is a constituency parser.
Please confirm.

@dlwh
Copy link
Owner

dlwh commented Jan 6, 2015

It produces constituency parses. Usually they are identical to Berkeley
Parser parses, but there is sometimes a small amount of disagreement.

-- David

On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:39 AM, kk00ss notifications@github.com wrote:

Hello, I'm interested in using your library.
As It's (currently) designed for use with grammars trained with the
Berkeley Parser - I assume Puck is a constituency parser.
Please confirm.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2.

@kk00ss kk00ss closed this as completed Jan 6, 2015
@kk00ss
Copy link
Author

kk00ss commented Jan 6, 2015

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants