Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TYPO3 9.5 #100

Open
the-hotmann opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

TYPO3 9.5 #100

the-hotmann opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@the-hotmann
Copy link

the-hotmann commented Jan 21, 2019

I would love to see this extension haviong Typo3 9 support.

I know Typo3 9 has its own sitemaps but evene if they have it seems not to be so professional like this extension.
ALso in Typo3 9 I cant map /sitemap.xml to the generated sitemap. It gives me a error and throws me back to Error 404.

With this extension I could simply use this .htaccess config and even use the same sitemap under /sitemap.xml without having to redirect the visitor to another URL.

.htacces:

# Sitemap.xml
RewriteRule ^sitemap\.xml$ /?eID=dd_googlesitemap [L]

In Typo3 9 this is not possible anymore... all the users have to be redirected to
/?sitemap=pages&type=1533906435&cHash=[insert_cHash_here]

even if I use this .htacces config it will not work as good as your extension!:

# Sitemap.xml
RewriteRule ^sitemap\.xml$ /?sitemap=pages&type=1533906435&cHash=[insert_cHash_here] [L]

Thats why I please u to make this awesome extension Typo3 9 compatible

@dmitryd
Copy link
Owner

dmitryd commented Jan 29, 2019

I will have a look.

@the-hotmann
Copy link
Author

Thanks mate because this is something I would love to have another extension that supports that beside the build in.. Because they are doing so much atm I dont like and which is in my eyes unprofessional.

Would love to see this extension running under Typo3 9.5

@JenHa
Copy link

JenHa commented Apr 9, 2020

Any news on this?

@dmitryd
Copy link
Owner

dmitryd commented Apr 25, 2020

At the moment nothing is planned because changed would be significant. It would require a lot of time, which I would have to take from my commercial projects. Not really worth for me at the moment. If there is a commercial customer, who needs this, or I have nothing to do, then new version would be possible.

This is the current state.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants