Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Wrong field name in processing era dataframe? #29

Closed
sciaba opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Wrong field name in processing era dataframe? #29

sciaba opened this issue May 22, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@sciaba
Copy link

sciaba commented May 22, 2019

In

StructField("processing_version", StringType(), True),

we have processing_version, but in

PROCESSING_ERA_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(120)

we have PROCESSING_ERA_NAME. It seems weird to me that the dataframe for the processing eras does not have the name, in fact. Is this just a typo?

@vkuznet
Copy link
Collaborator

vkuznet commented May 22, 2019 via email

@sciaba
Copy link
Author

sciaba commented May 23, 2019

The only thing is that I checked and that field seems to have only numeric values (even if in principle they are strings), so it is more compatible with a version than with a name....

@vkuznet
Copy link
Collaborator

vkuznet commented May 23, 2019

I'm adding Yuyi to comment on this.

@yuyiguo , Yuyi could you please let us know what are the attributes of processing era table in DBS. Do we have PROCESSING_ERA_NAME in there or not and where processing version is stored.

@yuyiguo
Copy link
Member

yuyiguo commented May 23, 2019

@vkuznet @sciaba
Hi Valentin, Andrea,
Here is what in DBS schema:
PROCESSING_ERA_ID(NUMBER)
PROCESSING_VERSION(NUMBER)
CREATION_DATE(NUMBER)
**CREATE_BY(VARCHAR2)
DESCRIPTION(VARCHAR2)

@vkuznet
Copy link
Collaborator

vkuznet commented May 30, 2019

This is fixed in master head in this commit 4c7515b
Closing the ticket.

@vkuznet vkuznet closed this as completed May 30, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants