-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong field name in processing era dataframe? #29
Comments
Andrea,
we should follow to whatever DBS schema is. And, what you found seems a typo, we
should have
StructField("processing_era_name", StringType(), True)
instead of
StructField("processing_version", StringType(), True)
Feel free to add PR to this issue.
V
…On 0, Andrea Sciaba ***@***.***> wrote:
In
https://github.com/dmwm/CMSSpark/blob/master/src/python/CMSSpark/schemas.py#L32
we have processing_version, but in
https://github.com/dmwm/CMSSpark/blob/7f72d51f1a9c58aa28483483cfbbd412264425e1/src/python/CMSSpark/schemas.py#L23
we have PROCESSING_ERA_NAME. It seems weird to me that the dataframe for the processing eras does not have the name, in fact. Is this just a typo?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#29
|
The only thing is that I checked and that field seems to have only numeric values (even if in principle they are strings), so it is more compatible with a version than with a name.... |
I'm adding Yuyi to comment on this. @yuyiguo , Yuyi could you please let us know what are the attributes of processing era table in DBS. Do we have PROCESSING_ERA_NAME in there or not and where processing version is stored. |
This is fixed in master head in this commit 4c7515b |
In
CMSSpark/src/python/CMSSpark/schemas.py
Line 32 in 7f72d51
we have processing_version, but in
CMSSpark/src/python/CMSSpark/schemas.py
Line 23 in 7f72d51
we have PROCESSING_ERA_NAME. It seems weird to me that the dataframe for the processing eras does not have the name, in fact. Is this just a typo?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: