Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

development of a set of API for the dedicate storage interaction #11

Closed
ericvaandering opened this issue Oct 31, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed
Assignees

Comments

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member

Original Savannah ticket 6381 reported by mcinquil on Sun Feb 10 11:04:41 2008.

Dedicated storage

Move from the GridFTP exclusive support to a generic SE interface (as a python API) to be used only for SB movement (Cli<->Server, Server<->WN)

@ghost ghost assigned ericvaandering Oct 31, 2013
@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by mcinquil on Sun Feb 17 17:26:07 2008

I have almost fully defined the API structure and I am also implementing srmv1 and srmv2 protocol with the different functions (compy, move, list, delete, check size, check permission,..). I have also almost completed the interface for the set of API.

I have just created a twiki that need to be expanded but that can give an idea on what is and how the API will be used:

[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/CrabServerSBinterface SBinterfaces-twiki]

Mattia

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by mcinquil on Tue Feb 26 13:21:42 2008

News:

  • added Exception class to handle operation error;

  • added "local protocol" (to be used for direct disk access);

  • extended the set of performed command.

    Mattia

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by mcinquil on Tue Mar 4 11:33:19 2008

Complete for SRMv1 and Local. SRMv2 partially implemented (for SRMv2 need to be used the dcache-srmclient-1.8 package).

[https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMS/CrabServerSBinterface Twiki]

[https://mcinquil.web.cern.ch/mcinquil/Project/SEAPI/html/ Storage/SEAPI Documentation]

Mattia

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member Author

Comment by mcinquil on Fri Mar 28 12:25:53 2008

Complete. Need to be well tested and to check if there is need to add new protocol support.

Mattia

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Member Author

Closed by spiga on Wed Apr 2 11:36:07 2008

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant