Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate and remove premium_price attribute from registrar order responses #155

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 5, 2018

Conversation

weppos
Copy link
Member

@weppos weppos commented Dec 28, 2017

It is going to be removed.
I'm actually torn about this commit. In theory we will still return it as nil, hence we may want to leave it here. However, we'd rather not expose it.
@weppos weppos self-assigned this Dec 28, 2017
@weppos weppos requested review from jodosha and aeden December 28, 2017 14:33
@weppos
Copy link
Member Author

weppos commented Dec 28, 2017

Going to update the clients once this PR is approved.

weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-go that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2017
weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-java that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2017
It contains a DomainRenewal and not a Domain. This is connected to dnsimple/dnsimple-developer#155 as I reviewed all models as part of the change.
weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-elixir that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2017
weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-ruby that referenced this pull request Dec 28, 2017
@@ -4112,7 +4100,7 @@ components:
properties:
period:
type: integer
preimum_price:
premium_price:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't premium_price supposed to be removed?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nope, this is the parameter. Not the response field.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, ok. 👍

Copy link
Member

@aeden aeden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see one instance of premium_price is retained... is that intentional?

weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-java that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2018
It contains a DomainRenewal and not a Domain. This is connected to dnsimple/dnsimple-developer#155 as I reviewed all models as part of the change.
weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-ruby that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2018
weppos added a commit to dnsimple/dnsimple-go that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2018
@weppos weppos merged commit 587da93 into master Jan 5, 2018
@weppos weppos deleted the premium-price branch January 5, 2018 11:20
OleMchls pushed a commit to OleMchls/dnsimple-elixir that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2018
@weppos weppos added documentation Updates on the documentation and support content. and removed change-api labels Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Updates on the documentation and support content.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants