Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Clarify user ID for docker attach #39

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Clarify user ID for docker attach #39

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor

Clarification was requested from @aaronlehmann while working on docker/docs#3494

Signed-off-by: Misty Stanley-Jones <misty@docker.com>
@mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc/ @mlaventure @thaJeztah

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

@mstanleyjones should this be in the moby/moby or docker/cli repository first?

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Oh, and against the 17.06 release branch if it needs to go in there https://github.com/docker/docker-ce/tree/17.06

@aaronlehmann
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks. I'm still not completely sure about talking about different users on the host - end users interact with Docker through a client, and the Docker daemon itself doesn't know or care which user account the client is running as, or even which host it's running on. But this is definitely better than the previous wording. LGTM.

@seemethere
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewhsu should this get merged into the upstream repo instead?

@mlaventure
Copy link
Contributor

@thaJeztah is correct, we don't accept changes to components on the master branch, only in the release branches.

If this is to be cherry-picked into the 17.06 release branch, it should first get merged in the upstream component.

@mlaventure mlaventure closed this Jun 7, 2017
@mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor Author

@aaronlehmann the thing I was trying to convey is that other users on the host can attach to a running container, even if they were not the ones that started that container.

Thanks all, I'll re-open this in the right repo. cc/ @tibor as FYI because we were not sure about process.

@tibor
Copy link

tibor commented Jun 7, 2017

@mstanleyjones I don’t think you meant me, did you?

@mdlinville
Copy link
Contributor Author

No sorry, @tiborvass :/ It's not my day.

docker-jenkins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2019
Ubuntu kernel supports overlayfs in user namespaces.

However, Docker had previously crafting overlay opaques directly
using mknod(2) and setxattr(2), which are not supported in userns.

Tested with LXD, Ubuntu 18.04, kernel 4.15.0-36-generic #39-Ubuntu.

Signed-off-by: Akihiro Suda <suda.akihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Upstream-commit: f8ed19c8b4dc17dc5b0147c12ce8c66d7c8898a6
Component: engine
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
6 participants