Provide jetty image

[proppy]

I'd be nice to have a jetty image based on the _/java one.

It would have to expose tags with different combination of debian/java/jetty version, and default :latest to the sable combinaison (if any) of all 3.

Example:

jetty:8-java6-wheezy
jetty:8-java6-jessie
jetty:9-java7-jessie
jetty:9-java8-experimental

I'm not sure if a :onbuild version would make sense, given that:

• the build usually happens outside of docker
• deps are assembled outside of docker by maven and go
• the entrypoint would be fixed to jetty

/cc @ludoch @ndeloof

[ludoch]

/cc @gregw from Jetty.

[md5]

FYI, I took the liberty of starting to work on a Jetty image on the model of the tomcat image this evening. My first pass is here: https://github.com/md5/docker-jetty

[md5]

I also put up an image on the Docker Hub here: https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/mdillon/jetty

The supported tags are: 7-jre7, 7-jre8, 8-jre7, 8-jre8, 9-jre7 (aka latest), and 9-jre8 (per http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/).

[md5]

Docs here: https://github.com/md5/docker-library-docs/tree/add-jetty/jetty

[tianon]

url='git://github.com/docker-library/jetty'

echo '# maintainer: InfoSiftr <github@infosiftr.com> (@infosiftr)'
echo '# maintainer: Mike Dillon <mike@embody.org> (@md5)'

If it means we finally get the elusive @md5 to agree to be an official image maintainer, I'm definitely willing to let this one in the list of images we maintain!

I've not dug in deep, but it's looking pretty reasonable so far. 👍

Are you sure you don't want to just keep it for yourself and not even involve us at the image level? 😄

url='git://github.com/md5/docker-jetty'

echo '# maintainer: Mike Dillon <mike@embody.org> (@md5)'

[md5]

I can switch it over to md5/docker-jetty. I was mainly just unclear if there were CLAs or anything involved with Docker, Inc. I suppose I should have a better idea of how this works after watching it for a few months.

[md5]

Updated appropriate/docker-jetty@1fc8fda and https://github.com/md5/docker-library-docs/commit/0fd0aaa2cd4cb6accc137c96a765358585cd53fb

[md5]

Could you guys answer my implied question about the CLA? Does Docker, Inc need to have an explicit license/copyright on official images or is that just an artifact of @infosiftr's agreement with @docker? I'll update the copyrights from "Docker, Inc" to myself if there is not a requirement to assign to Docker, Inc.

[yosifkit]

@md5, no requirement on copyright to Docker, just expectation of reasonable updates and bug fixes. So yes it is just an artifact of our own agreement with Docker.

Official repos docs; specifically license info

[md5]

I signed up for the jetty-announce list. Assuming I'm not being naive about the type of workload this image will entail, I think I can handle taking care of updates and bug fixes in a timely fashion too.

I'll review those docs and look at creating a PR to pull jetty into the official images.

[yosifkit]

Awesome, thanks @md5. I am sure @tianon will pipe in if I forgot something.