New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update test engine version to 19.03.12 #2584
Conversation
Jenkinsfile
Outdated
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ def runTests = { Map settings -> | |||
throw new Exception("Need test image object, e.g.: `runTests(testImage: img)`") | |||
} | |||
if (!dockerVersion) { | |||
throw new Exception("Need Docker version to test, e.g.: `runTests(dockerVersion: '1.12.3')`") | |||
throw new Exception("Need Docker version to test, e.g.: `runTests(dockerVersion: '19.03.11')`") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not really important, but thought it would be clearer to use a more realistic example in the error
Interesting; build failing on Jenkins; https://ci-next.docker.com/public/blue/organizations/jenkins/docker-py/detail/PR-2584/1/pipeline
This is on an Ubuntu 19.10 machine;
|
Oh! I think these are the nodes that were setup for testing cgroups v2 @StefanScherer ? |
Jenkinsfile
Outdated
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ def buildImages = { -> | |||
} | |||
|
|||
def getDockerVersions = { -> | |||
def dockerVersions = ["19.03.5"] | |||
def dockerVersions = ["19.03.11"] | |||
wrappedNode(label: "ubuntu && !zfs && amd64") { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It picked Ubuntu 19.10 randomly.
Should we pin it better by using a label ubuntu-1804
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or should we remove the ubuntu-1910 machine again? Maybe better and add ubuntu-2004 LTS machines instead. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, probably, or do you have ideas for a labelling scheme where those nodes are not selected in the "regular" pools?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, our comments crossed LOL
I just opened #2585
rebased, as #2585 was merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
Updated to 19.03.12 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
No description provided.