Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove obsolete CS Engine docs #8452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 20, 2019

Conversation

thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

This comment docker/for-linux#597 (comment) put my attention to these pages still being included in the documentation, but CS Engine has reached EOL, so better to remove them (they should still be available in the archived version of the documentation if really needed).

@thaJeztah thaJeztah added area/engine Issue affects Docker engine/daemon area/deprecated labels Mar 13, 2019
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

ping @L-Hudson @mklamb @trapier PTAL

@GordonTheTurtle
Copy link

Deploy preview for docsdocker ready!

Built with commit dc7742f

https://deploy-preview-8452--docsdocker.netlify.com

@GordonTheTurtle
Copy link

GordonTheTurtle commented Mar 13, 2019

Deploy preview for docsdocker ready!

Built with commit e8950ce

https://deploy-preview-8452--docsdocker.netlify.com

Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member Author

Re-pushed; forgot to remove it from the navigation 😅

@mklamb
Copy link

mklamb commented Mar 13, 2019

LGTM, but will defer to @L-Hudson for archival strategy

@bermudezmt
Copy link
Contributor

@shampabh @paigehargrave @JustinINevill Let's have a look at this PR when we meet later this week.

@JustinINevill JustinINevill merged commit 77f3357 into docker:master Mar 20, 2019
@thaJeztah thaJeztah deleted the remove_obsolete_cs_docs branch March 21, 2019 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/engine Issue affects Docker engine/daemon
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants