Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: return updated doc #1089

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024
Merged

fix: return updated doc #1089

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2024

Conversation

catalinpit
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fetch the updated version of the document after sealing it and return it. Previously, the document.documentData.data wasn't up to date. Now it is.

Related Issue

Fixes #1088.

Testing Performed

  • Added console.logs in the code to make sure it returns the proper data
  • Set up a webhook and tested that the webhook receives the updated data

Checklist

  • I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
  • I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these changes.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if applicable.
  • I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
  • I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous submission, if applicable.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Walkthrough

The update to the sealDocument function marks a significant improvement in the way document data is handled. By fetching the latest document from the database before triggering a webhook, it ensures that the most current and accurate document data is used. This change directly addresses the issue where outdated document data was passed to the trigger function, enhancing the reliability and accuracy of the system's operations.

Changes

File(s) Summary
.../server-only/document/seal-document.ts Updated to fetch the latest document data from the database before triggering a webhook.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[#1088]: Old data passed to trigger function

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 8, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
stg-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 8, 2024 0:17am
stg-marketing ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 8, 2024 0:17am
2 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prd-app ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 8, 2024 0:17am
prd-marketing ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 8, 2024 0:17am

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 8, 2024

🚨 @catalinpit has 5 pull requests awaiting review. Please consider reviewing them when possible. 🚨

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review Status

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between fc70f78 and 00af552.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/lib/server-only/document/seal-document.ts (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
packages/lib/server-only/document/seal-document.ts (3)

156-164: Fetching the updated document after sealing ensures that the most current data is used. This is a crucial fix for the issue described.


165-168: Triggering the webhook with the updated document data is a good practice. It ensures that downstream systems receive the most accurate and current information.


153-171: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-168]

Ensure robust error handling for database operations, PDF processing, and file operations to enhance system reliability.

@dguyen dguyen merged commit 627265f into main Apr 8, 2024
15 checks passed
@dguyen dguyen deleted the fix/old-data-seal-document-webhook branch April 8, 2024 12:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Old data is passed to the trigger function
2 participants