Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: complete document when all recipients are CC #1113

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Apr 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

catalinpit
Copy link
Contributor

@catalinpit catalinpit commented Apr 23, 2024

Description

Automatically marks the document as completed if all the recipients are CC.

Changes Made

Added an if statement in the last form step (onAddSubjectFormSubmit) that checks if all the recipients are CC. If so, the document status is updated to COMPLETED.

Testing Performed

Tested the changes and they work as expected.

Checklist

  • I have tested these changes locally and they work as expected.
  • I have added/updated tests that prove the effectiveness of these changes.
  • I have updated the documentation to reflect these changes, if applicable.
  • I have followed the project's coding style guidelines.
  • I have addressed the code review feedback from the previous submission, if applicable.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced document sending logic to update document status based on recipient roles.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Removed redundant form submission handling in the document editing feature.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prd-app 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 26, 2024 10:23am
stg-app ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 26, 2024 10:23am
stg-marketing ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 26, 2024 10:23am
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
prd-marketing ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 26, 2024 10:23am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 23, 2024

Important

Auto Review Skipped

Auto reviews are limited to the following labels: coderabbit. Please add one of these labels to enable auto reviews.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The recent modifications focus on enhancing document workflow. In the web application, a line handling form submission was removed from the document editing functionality. In the server package, a new validation checks if all document recipients are marked as CC, subsequently updating the document's status based on this condition, either to COMPLETED or PENDING.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../documents/[id]/edit-document.tsx Removed a line related to form submission handling in the onAddSubjectFormSubmit function.
.../server-only/document/send-document.tsx Added a check for allRecipientsAreCC to update the document status to COMPLETED or PENDING.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the apps: web Issues related to the webapp label Apr 23, 2024
@catalinpit catalinpit marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 11:27
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/lib/server-only/document/send-document.tsx (1)

211-220: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [214-236]

The implementation of checking if all recipients are CC and updating the document status based on this is correct and efficient. However, consider adding a comment explaining this logic for future maintainability.

Copy link
Member

@ElTimuro ElTimuro left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • tested locally, looks good

@Mythie Mythie merged commit 8a24ca2 into main Apr 27, 2024
13 checks passed
@Mythie Mythie deleted the fix/doc-status-cc-role branch April 27, 2024 11:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
apps: web Issues related to the webapp
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants