Thx with args

[AnEmortalKid]

Part of #194 , this time handling the case with arguments

[vpzomtrrfrt]

Nested function calls would be worth adding tests for too

[AnEmortalKid]

Nested function calls would be worth adding tests for too

Umm, mind sharing an example? If it’s with the much keyword I think I have an idea. Or are you thinking of the chained ones like bar().baz()

[vpzomtrrfrt]

Nested function calls would be worth adding tests for too

Umm, mind sharing an example? If it’s with the much keyword I think I have an idea. Or are you thinking of the chained ones like bar().baz()

I was thinking more like plz a with b plz c with d e thx f thx

[AnEmortalKid]

Ah, plz a with b plz c with d e thx f thx

To produce a(b, c(d,e)).

I don’t think I’ve handled that yet, but I’ll see if the handling of arguments is enough!

[AnEmortalKid]

Welll, that's gonna need some work

$ dogescript testlet.djs
a(b, plz, c, with, d, e)f thx

$ cat testlet.djs
plz a with b plz c with d e thx f thx

Mostly cause of the way the arguments are handled: https://github.com/dogescript/dogescript/pull/199/files#diff-3fab227e34d65fe9bb2d6ea53eec41cfR712

I've done some exploration of trying to tackle the ambiguity of keywords here #200 by making a stack of states (of kinds). I'll create an issue to follow up on seeing what it's gonna take to make that case work

@vpzomtrrfrt ^

[AnEmortalKid]

Logged #201 to address testing gaps.