Update Android cmake.

[Sonicadvance1]

This is required to properly build the MIPS64 and x86_64 targets with clang.

[Icekhaos]

Wait.

We have a MIPS port now?

[Sonicadvance1]

Nope

[fuel-pcbox]

"This is required to properly build the MIPS64 and x86_64 targets with
clang." implies that there's a MIPS64 port.

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Ryan Houdek notifications@github.com
wrote:

Nope

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1971 (comment).

[Sonicadvance1]

There isn't.

[Icekhaos]

Then why do we need it to build on MIPS and Intel?

[pauldacheez]

MIPS "support" is interpreter-only and is done via the "generic" build config, which builds as long as you're building for a little-endian architecture that your compiler supports. Without a JIT, though, you can't really call an arch "supported", can you?

[Icekhaos]

Actually, yes, you can, but not supported by official means, rather as collateral. Provided as-is is sufficient here.

[Sonicadvance1]

We test multiple build targets that we don't support purely on the basis to make sure we remain portable enough to potentially be on those platforms.
If in the future someone wants to add support, we choose to make their life easier.
Makes sure we don't have any architecture specific quirks that would impede development on a new architecture.

[Icekhaos]

Might then be my learning dive into MIPS.

[Sonicadvance1]

There aren't any MIPS32 targets that are capable of running our OpenGL backend.
I'd recommend MIPS64 since it would be a more viable target.

[Icekhaos]

When the Warrior I goes into full scale production, I will probably get myself to do something about that. As is, no 64 bit MIPS processor is out.

[Sonicadvance1]

Aye, which is why the AArch64 recompiler core was started under qemu