An algorithm for accurately predicting the city in which a given image was taken: https://cities19test.herokuapp.com/
See a youtube demonstration of the tool in here
Arad, Itamar, Dor, Daniel, Sagi
Classifying cities by images. The classifier is doing a good job especially in suburbs and highways of cities, where it is more difficult for a human to distinguish between different cities.
The final results in detail (include all relevant steps and moving pieces, techniques you tried, metrics that you achieved, etc)
Classifying the right city on the test data of Mapillary with 93% accuracy. For out of our data set image The moving pieces of the model included these steps: Defining the problem Getting a dataset Sampling from dataset - adapting to our needs / problem Data pipeline to serve the sampled images: Data generator Tensor flow Dataset Pre-processing of images: Black and white Data augmentation Resizing for different image sizes Data augmentation De-noising and outlier detection with auto-encoder Modeling Tried several networks architecture Transfer learning, several attempts LeNet ResNet MobileNet InceptionV3 VGG16 Hyper-Parameter tuning: Learning rate Optimizers Batch sizes Interpretation: Lime super-pixels: Visualizing that for different images when the model is sure about his decision and making a false prediction and also to try to see when the model is sure about the decision and getting positive prediction. Feature map visualizing to try to understand how the model process images, and what is important Different Kernels visualizing Measuring performance metrics: Val accuracy Test set Precision/ Recall/ Accuracy Trying Images from different datasets (StreetView/ random images..) Top 1 vs. Top 5 accuracy on different models Still having generalization issues that Serving our model Deploying our model on Heroku server https://cities19test.herokuapp.com/ Letting the user upload image Showing him the first score, and then the 4 most probable cities. Showing the user the lime explainer next to the original picture GAN attempt
Great success on the Mapillary - 93% accuracy on 19 classes on pictures that the model has never seen before. Partial success on out of dataset images - we are estimating around 80% success on unseen images from suburbs and highways, and much lower on city centers and it differs with each city (diverse in pictures of not in the dataset). We still haven’t established a big enough and solid dataset to test those assumptions regarding out of dataset photos.
Identifying the city with features that humans are not able to! Not identifying well landmarks https://cities19test.herokuapp.com/
The 3 largest challenges that the team had to overcome to build this (especially unexpected challenges):
Data preprocessing Adapting dataset to our needs Allow easy access to images Preprocessing Affecting time performance Preprocessing Affecting accuracy performance Outlier detection, convolutioned and rule based Generalization Images are not very representative of what we consider to be the city Research challenges - Finding the right platforms - colab - copy of notebooks Splitting research on same project for 5 ppl Challenge of documenting research process
Better definition of the business problem: We started our research without a specific business problem but with the ambition of finding out how far we can stretch the classification abilities of CNN. The result is pretty impressive. Nevertheless, having a well defined business problem could have served us as a guideline that would have helped us improve our model on specific tasks.
Spend more time on EDA and work on improving the input data: The mapillary dataset consists mostly of images taken out of driving cars. It would have been nice to do more EDA on the images and split them into different groups, like highways, parks and trees, suburban or city center. We would analyse how many pictures of each type we have per city and could compare the performance of the prediction per class or try to enrich our data set accordingly.
Agree on benchmarks and metrics to train and evaluate models: We trained and tested many different models. Retrospectively we would predefine our (hyper-)parameters, such as input size, batch size, loss functions to make our results comparable. Further we should have logged all our results to be able to monitor progress.
We discovered that certain cities (like Ottawa, Copenhagen, Helsinki) are working quite well on out of data pictures. For other cities (like Paris, Moscow, Budapest) predictions for screenshots, that were taken from google maps, where often predicted falsely (even though the city usually appears within the top 5 predictions).
Therefore we would to improve our project by introducing active learning, a semi-supervised training method.
A second strategy would focus on introducing more images of iconic places and characteristic architectural features into the training data.
POC of the project: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tJi9oaRTegFKCR7S73Av9yoi-Q46SxQXEpb5iYw6dFE/edit?usp=sharing