Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document temporal tables #4252

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 13, 2023
Merged

Document temporal tables #4252

merged 4 commits into from
Feb 13, 2023

Conversation

ajcvickers
Copy link
Member

Fixes #3355

@ajcvickers ajcvickers requested a review from a team February 11, 2023 19:54
* The creation of temporal tables using [EF Core Migrations](xref:core/managing-schemas/migrations/index)
* Transformation of existing tables into temporal tables, again using Migrations
* Querying historical data
* Restoring data from some point in the past
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is "reading" more accurate than "restoring"? Restoring sounds like the ability to revert the entire table to some past state.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Restoring is what I show in the example. That is, reading data from some previous point in time and then updating the current state with that data.

@@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ uid: core/providers/provider-log

# Provider-impacting changes

> [!IMPORTANT]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we just remove this page? It seems to have very very little value at this point...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should not make it 404. But deleting the content might make sense.

ajcvickers and others added 3 commits February 13, 2023 11:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document temporal tables
2 participants