Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add 2018/Hardware-Intrinsics-Intel #65

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018
Merged

Add 2018/Hardware-Intrinsics-Intel #65

merged 1 commit into from Sep 19, 2018

Conversation

terrajobst
Copy link
Member

/cc: @tannergooding @dotnet/fxdc

@tannergooding
Copy link
Member

Might be worth mentioning https://github.com/dotnet/coreclr/issues/20057, which I believe we decided for both ARM and x86 Intrinsics. That is, explode the signatures to make the supported types explicit as this makes it more clear and avoids ambiguities when/if later ISAs add support for additional types (such as Half).

* Yeah we should do them :-)
- [#30266](https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/30266)
Avx2.BroadcastScalarToVector128(T*) overloads are missing
- [#18831](https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/18831) HW intrinsics -

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants