Add Supported OS JSON files #9294
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,11 +1,12 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "channel-version": "9.0", | ||
| "last-updated": "2024-05-01", | ||
| "families": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Android", | ||
| "distributions": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "android", | ||
| "name": "Android", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.google.com/android", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -14,102 +15,86 @@ | |
| "arm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Just curious, why is this termed "cycles" rather than "versions"? There was a problem hiding this comment. We tried to keep the terminology close to https://endoflife.date/docs/api There was a problem hiding this comment. Do we believe that it is a good name? I find this name very odd. We do not have to stick with bad names. This is not 1:1 mapping with that APIs. There was a problem hiding this comment. I found release cycle fine, but have no hard feelings about using versions instead. There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But it is still not ideal. Release cycle is a repeatable process that produces releases. For example, take a look at how Ubuntu describes its current release cycle: https://ubuntu.com/about/release-cycle. This is not a list of the process variations. This is a list of what the process produced. So There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
||
| "14", | ||
| "13", | ||
| "12.1", | ||
| "12" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Apple", | ||
| "distributions": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "ios", | ||
| "name": "iOS", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.apple.com/ios/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "arm64" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. There are differences in supported architectures for iOS and the Simulator according to https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/b488f858df2803b353233f38b16786913d6bcbc7/release-notes/9.0/supported-os.md#ios--tvos--maccatalyst which will be lost by your change. We would need to reflect that somewhere. |
||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "17", | ||
| "16", | ||
| "15" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "ipados", | ||
| "name": "iPadOS", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.apple.com/ipados/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "17", | ||
| "16", | ||
| "15" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "macos", | ||
| "name": "macOS", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.apple.com/macos/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "14", | ||
| "13", | ||
| "12" | ||
| ], | ||
| "notes" : [ | ||
| "The iOS and tvOS simulators are supported on macOS Arm64 and x64.", | ||
| "The x64 emulator (Rosetta 2) is supported on macOS Arm64.", | ||
| "Mac Catalyst apps are supported on macOS Arm64 and x64." | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "tvos", | ||
| "name": "tvOS", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.apple.com/apple-tv/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "17", | ||
| "16", | ||
| "15", | ||
| "14", | ||
| "13", | ||
| "12.2" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Linux", | ||
| "distributions": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "alpine", | ||
| "name": "Alpine", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://alpinelinux.org/releases/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -118,12 +103,14 @@ | |
| "arm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "3.20", | ||
| "3.19", | ||
| "3.18", | ||
richlander marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| "3.17" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "debian", | ||
| "name": "Debian", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -132,11 +119,11 @@ | |
| "arm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "12" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "fedora", | ||
| "name": "Fedora", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -145,46 +132,51 @@ | |
| "arm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "40", | ||
| "39" | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. According to https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/v9.0.0-preview.5/release-notes/9.0/supported-os.md only 40+ are supported by .NET 9 based on this commit: 56290a0#diff-4a789e8157a6362c43a84f58d12646edc31b264f899378cb553c381aafe60f37 |
||
| ] | ||
richlander marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "opensuse", | ||
| "name": "openSUSE Leap", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://en.opensuse.org/Lifetime", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "15.6", | ||
| "15.5" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "rhel", | ||
| "name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "9", | ||
| "8" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "sles", | ||
| "name": "SUSE Enterprise Linux", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "40", | ||
| "39" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "ubuntu", | ||
| "name": "Ubuntu", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -193,16 +185,15 @@ | |
| "arm" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "24.04", | ||
| "22.04", | ||
| "20.04" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Windows", | ||
| "distributions": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "Nano Server", | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Where do you intend to add the information about Nano Server and Windows Server Core? They have different support information, so I'm not sure if we can just refer to any of the remaining ones. Especially since Nano Server only supports
richlander marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
@@ -216,64 +207,63 @@ | |
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "windows", | ||
| "name": "Windows", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://support.microsoft.com/help/13853/windows-lifecycle-fact-sheet", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "x86", | ||
| "arm64" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "11-23h2-e", | ||
| "11-23h2-w", | ||
| "11-22h2-e", | ||
| "11-22h2-w", | ||
| "10-22h2", | ||
| "11-21h2-e", | ||
| "10-21h2-e-lts", | ||
| "10-1809-e-lts", | ||
| "10-1607-e-lts" | ||
| ], | ||
| "notes": [ | ||
| "The x64 emulator is supported on Windows 11 Arm64." | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "windows-server", | ||
| "name": "Windows Server", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://learn.microsoft.com/windows-server/get-started/windows-server-release-info", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "x86" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "23H2", | ||
| "2022", | ||
| "2019", | ||
| "2016" | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| "id": "windows-server-core", | ||
| "name": "Windows Server Core", | ||
| "lifecycle-policy": "https://learn.microsoft.com/windows-server/get-started/windows-server-release-info", | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
| "x64", | ||
| "x86" | ||
| ], | ||
| "supported-cycles": [ | ||
| "23H2", | ||
| "2022", | ||
| "2019", | ||
| "2016" | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| ], | ||
| "libc": { | ||
| "glibc": [ | ||
| { | ||
| "architectures": [ | ||
richlander marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
|
@@ -302,5 +292,11 @@ | |
| "source": "Alpine 3.13" | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| }, | ||
| "qemu": | ||
| { | ||
| "notes": [ | ||
| "The [QEMU](https://www.qemu.org/) emulator is not supported to run .NET apps. QEMU is used, for example, to emulate Arm64 containers on x64, and vice versa." | ||
| ] | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
x86 is also supported on Android
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not according to https://github.com/dotnet/core/blob/main/release-notes/9.0/supported-os.md#android