Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 2, 2023. It is now read-only.

Precondition APIs need to be better #69

Closed
KrzysztofCwalina opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

Precondition APIs need to be better #69

KrzysztofCwalina opened this issue Mar 27, 2015 · 0 comments
Assignees
@KrzysztofCwalina
Labels
area-Other OpenBeforeArchiving These issues were open before the repo was archived. For re-open them, file them in the new repo
Milestone
Future

Comments

@KrzysztofCwalina
Copy link
Member

The should allow verifying ranges.
Also, when a failure happens, better diagnostics information should be easily available.
@KrzysztofCwalina KrzysztofCwalina self-assigned this Nov 10, 2015
@ahsonkhan ahsonkhan added this to the 2.1.0 milestone Apr 6, 2017
@joshfree joshfree modified the milestones: 2.1.0, Future Apr 5, 2018
@pgovind pgovind added the OpenBeforeArchiving These issues were open before the repo was archived. For re-open them, file them in the new repo label Mar 11, 2021
@pgovind pgovind closed this as completed Mar 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees

@KrzysztofCwalina KrzysztofCwalina

Labels
area-Other OpenBeforeArchiving These issues were open before the repo was archived. For re-open them, file them in the new repo
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Future
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@joshfree @ahsonkhan @KrzysztofCwalina @pgovind