Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove use of "statement body" #999

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: draft-v8
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jskeet
Copy link
Contributor

@jskeet jskeet commented Nov 22, 2023

(This was originally about both statement bodies and multiple definitions; the multiple definitions part has been done in #1019.)

Even though the precise context for the original definitions isn't applicable other times, it's simpler to just leave those as the sole definitions. The other uses are conceptually equivalent - it's not like we're actually defining different terms.

Additionally, replace "statement body" with "block body" for both properties and indexers.

Fixes #877.

@jskeet jskeet added the meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting label Nov 22, 2023
Even though the precise context for the original definitions isn't
applicable other times, it's simpler to just leave those as the sole
definitions. The other uses are conceptually equivalent - it's not
like we're actually defining different terms.

Additionally, replace "statement body" with "block body" for both
properties and indexers.

Fixes dotnet#948.
Fixes dotnet#877.
BillWagner
BillWagner previously approved these changes Nov 27, 2023
Copy link
Member

@BillWagner BillWagner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This LGTM. Let's go ahead and :shipit:

@@ -3168,15 +3168,15 @@ The *member_name* ([§15.6.1](classes.md#1561-general)) specifies the name of th

The *type* of a property shall be at least as accessible as the property itself ([§7.5.5](basic-concepts.md#755-accessibility-constraints)).

A *property_body* may either consist of a ***statement body*** or an ***expression body***. In a statement body, *accessor_declarations*, which shall be enclosed in “`{`” and “`}`” tokens, declare the accessors ([§15.7.3](classes.md#1573-accessors)) of the property. The accessors specify the executable statements associated with reading and writing the property.
A *property_body* may either consist of a block body or an expression body. In a block body, *accessor_declarations*, which shall be enclosed in “`{`” and “`}`” tokens, declare the accessors ([§15.7.3](classes.md#1573-accessors)) of the property. The accessors specify the executable statements associated with reading and writing the property.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note in discussion: this isn't right, but we don't have a good term yet. "Accessor body", "accessor section" and "accessor list" are some options discussed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jskeet jskeet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not merging now, as we want to improve this further.

@jskeet jskeet self-assigned this Nov 29, 2023
@jskeet
Copy link
Contributor Author

jskeet commented Nov 29, 2023

Assigned to myself for further work, and splitting into "just stars" and "just terms".

@BillWagner
Copy link
Member

Note to correlate the use of block and "expression body" on static constructor, instance constructors, and finalizers.

@jskeet jskeet added status: in-progress The assignee has actively started working on this; consult with them before taking other actions and removed meeting: discuss This issue should be discussed at the next TC49-TG2 meeting labels Nov 29, 2023
jskeet added a commit to jskeet/csharpstandard that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
This is half of what dotnet#999 was trying to do; the rest requires some
more work.
BillWagner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2023
This is half of what #999 was trying to do; the rest requires some
more work.
@jskeet jskeet changed the title Avoid defining block body and expression body multiple times Remove use of "statement body" Jan 8, 2024
@jskeet
Copy link
Contributor Author

jskeet commented Feb 7, 2024

(I'm not really requesting a review - I just wanted to remove the "approved" bit.)

@jskeet jskeet dismissed BillWagner’s stale review February 7, 2024 12:50

We're re-doing this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: in-progress The assignee has actively started working on this; consult with them before taking other actions
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reword "statement body" to "block body" for properties
2 participants