You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In writing a type extension without remembering the typical syntax I arrived at something like:
typeId= Id ofinttypeIdwithstatic memberOf(x)=if x <1then
failwithf "Id must be less than %d"1else
Id x
Which gives the error:
Unexpected syntax or possible incorrect indentation: this token is offside of context started at position (5:10). Try indenting this further.
To continue using non-conforming indentation, pass the '--strict-indentation-' flag to the compiler, or set the language version to F# 7.
The error is clear enough and I was able to quickly fix the problem by indenting if beyond the s in static, however it seems like a situation where the indentation requirements could be loosened back to the with keyword.
Describe the solution you'd like
The above code could be made to compile without errors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another thing that could be done is moving the "Try indenting this further." part of the message to the start, as the proposed solution may not fit on the screen with inline errors (see attached screenshot)
I'm happy enough with the standard syntax:
typeIdwithstatic memberOf(x)=if x <1then
failwithf "Id must be less than %d"1else
Id x
I would assume this is "by design" with current rules, and this will need change in the lexer(?) spec. Maybe @auduchinok can chime in with more details.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In writing a type extension without remembering the typical syntax I arrived at something like:
Which gives the error:
The error is clear enough and I was able to quickly fix the problem by indenting
if
beyond thes
instatic
, however it seems like a situation where the indentation requirements could be loosened back to thewith
keyword.Describe the solution you'd like
The above code could be made to compile without errors.
Describe alternatives you've considered
Another thing that could be done is moving the "Try indenting this further." part of the message to the start, as the proposed solution may not fit on the screen with inline errors (see attached screenshot)
I'm happy enough with the standard syntax:
Additional context
related: #11481
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: