Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ASP.NET 5 (vNext) Support #264

Closed
enricosada opened this issue Feb 23, 2015 · 7 comments
Closed

ASP.NET 5 (vNext) Support #264

enricosada opened this issue Feb 23, 2015 · 7 comments

Comments

@enricosada
Copy link
Contributor

About ASP.NET 5 (vNext) running on the full .NET Framework.

there are some feature who are needed for it, like:

is this the repo or is fsharp/fsharp or vNext repo ?

Sry if it is an useless issue, but i think is good to track this because is important

ref uservoice

@KevinRansom
Copy link
Member

Clearly this is something that is a priority for the ASP, .Net framework, Clr and Managed Languages teams and will be a priority for us. We are in the process of finalizing how F# will fit into this new cross platform open source world. We will be updating our roadmap for F# and that will include information on coreclr and asp vnext support.

Right now the very best thing the community can focus on is fixing F# bugs for VS 2015.

@enricosada
Copy link
Contributor Author

@KevinRansom good to know!

/cc @panesofglass

how F# will fit into this new cross platform open source world

No offense meant, but this sound really marketing speak 😄

@panesofglass
Copy link
Contributor

That's unfortunate. As someone who is using F# primarily as a web platform, I see this as very important. @enricosada, you can see current state of F# support for vNext at https://github.com/YoloDev/YoloDev.FSharp.AspNet.

@dbettin
Copy link

dbettin commented Feb 25, 2015

"We are in the process of finalizing how F# will fit into this new cross platform open source world." Isn't this something that should be "finalized" in the open?

I find support for both .Net Core and Asp.Net 5 hugely important for F# and its growth. They are people waiting to help out on this front. Fixing bugs and moving F# into the next generation is not a zero-sum game.

@forki
Copy link
Contributor

forki commented Feb 25, 2015

I think this is mainly a communication issue. Some twitter comments by members of the ASP.NET raised serious concerns about the future. I'm sure this will all work out somehow and smart people are thinking about solutions, but the communication about this is really bad.

@enricosada
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I wrote badly my comment, the /cc was not about the marketing speak ( i was joking about it) and was not an attack to @KevinRansom or the team. I need more newline 😄

I was curious about the roadmap, and how i can help.
I know if i try to do something on .netcore and vNext now is pretty useless, if is going to be replaced by a microsoft implementation, so better focus on other visualfsharp issues.
If in progress i'd like to help try it and send feeback (more on netcore than vNext)

Maybe an high level roadmap can help.
Netcore and vNext are open question, last time (winrt, xaml, wpf, mvc, azure) the other side was closed source, now is not and is doing a really good job about explain the vision and engage community for new features. Btw you too @KevinRansom and @latkin !

I read time ago in the @davidfowl blog about vNext plugin status and @YoloDev work, the compiler issues and todo, and i think some people want to help (but maybe they dont have much interest now in the f# tools visual studio extension or fsi)

@dsyme
Copy link
Contributor

dsyme commented Feb 26, 2015

Is it possible for someone in the community to take the @YoloDev work and iterate on it? Those kinds of experiments are always useful.

(FWIW I don't think either this repo or fsharp/fsharp are technically the right place to do this, though it's ok to chat about it here :) )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants