Prepare the FabricBot config for migration to Policy Service #20540
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ghost
added
the
|
Hey there @jeffhandley! Thank you so much for your PR! Someone from the team will get assigned to your PR shortly and we'll get it reviewed. |
|
/azp run |
|
Azure Pipelines could not run because the pipeline triggers exclude this branch/path. |
mkArtakMSFT
approved these changes
Feb 22, 2024
jfversluis
approved these changes
Feb 26, 2024
rmarinho
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2024
* Explicitly filter to issues for comment events * Remove references to project events
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Building on top of #20527, this updates the FabricBot configuration to address issues we've seen migrating other repositories to the Policy Service automation. There are no behavioral changes in this PR.
event_typesetting, but after the port, the explicit filter will be needed./cc @mkArtakMSFT @wtgodbe