AssemblyCopyright is incorrect?

[BethMassi]

(reported via contact@dotnetfoundation.org from Jay Sulzberger)
In the file

https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/blob/master/src/System.Numerics.Vectors/src/Properties/AssemblyInfo.cs

there is no mention of the MIT License, under which, according to press accounts, Dotnet Core is now licensed. Rather we have this line:

[assembly: AssemblyCopyright("\x00a9 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.")]

which is line 14 by Github's count.

I think this is just a typo.

[Petermarcu]

The license on the top is MIT. Interestingly, the assembly info is still saying Microsoft Corp. We'll take a look.

[nguerrera]

Is this really incorrect? The attribute describes the copyright, not the license, no? What do other projects do?

[Eilon]

@Petermarcu @nguerrera @BethMassi if you start a mail thread with me I can describe to you what we do in other projects.

[AArnott]

Personally, I've never noticed that the copyright attribute carried license information in any other project, open source or otherwise.

[akoeplinger]

Addtionally, shouldn't it be (c) .NET Foundation instead of (c) Microsoft Corp. now?

[nguerrera]

This was discussed offline and the attribute here is correct.