Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge working scenario feature branch to master #41

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 27, 2015

Conversation

iamjasonp
Copy link
Member

The scenario feature branch was getting a little messy with some errant commits and merges that weren't squashed (mainly responses to PR feedback).

We didn't want to squash all the way in order to preserve some git blame history, so this is the middle ground that we were able to strike between squashing and preserving all commits.

There were some funny merge errors as we were bringing the changes over - hence an additional fixup checkin (in case I messed something up - easy to revert/blame)

dotnet-bot and others added 3 commits May 14, 2015 01:58
* Setup script
* Clean up self-hosted WCF Test Service E2E
* Support more than one parameter to build.cmd for OuterLoop Tests
* Port over scenario tests and rationalize names
* Remove packages.config references from ServiceModel.Scenarios.Common.csproj
* Change exception messages in TypedProxyTests to state "timed out" rather than "failed".
* Removing/replacing instances of Assert.True where it's no longer needed
  for exception catching
* Modified a test to not use try { } catch { } Assert.True pattern
@roncain
Copy link
Contributor

roncain commented May 27, 2015

:shipit:

1 similar comment
@mconnew
Copy link
Member

mconnew commented May 27, 2015

:shipit:

roncain added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2015
Merge working scenario feature branch to master
@roncain roncain merged commit af86fe9 into dotnet:master May 27, 2015
@iamjasonp iamjasonp deleted the scenario-tests branch May 28, 2015 03:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants