Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update HEProxy.cs #331

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2024
Merged

Update HEProxy.cs #331

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2024

Conversation

NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX commented Jun 29, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved handling of debug messages, console output, and optimizations based on project kind.
    • Streamlined method signatures and enhanced internal logic for better performance and maintainability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the HEProxy.cs file in the Natasha.CSharp project involve refactoring to adjust behaviors based on various project kinds, specifically for debugging, console output, and optimization handling. The refactoring includes modifications to method signatures, body content, and introduces conditional logic based on project kinds.

Changes

Files Affected Change Summary
src/.../HEProxy.cs Refactored methods to handle different project kinds (HEProjectKind) for debugging, console output, and optimizations.
src/.../HEProxy.cs Removed and modified method parameters and bodies of several methods.

Poem

In code where proxies dwell,
They listen to project kind well.
Debug messages light the way,
Console outputs join the fray.
With optimizations set just right,
HotExecutor shines bright! 🌟


Tip

Early access features
  • OpenAI gpt-4o model for reviews and chat.

Note:

  • You can disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by setting early_access: false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.
  • Please join our Discord Community to provide feedback and report issues.
  • OSS projects are always opted into early access features.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2024

Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

Copy link

UT Test - Ubuntu

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit b2988a3.

@NMSAzulX
Copy link
Collaborator Author

未检测到合适的 ISSUE 推荐给您。感谢您的反馈!

该条自动推荐信息来自于 nms-bot.

Copy link

UT Test - Windows

1 tests   1 ✅  0s ⏱️
1 suites  0 💤
1 files    0 ❌

Results for commit b2988a3.

@NMSAzulX NMSAzulX merged commit 68fd777 into dev.next Jun 29, 2024
8 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eaacdc and b2988a3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs (8 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (7)
src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs (7)

215-215: Verify all function calls to HandlePickedProxyMethod are updated accordingly.

The method body has been modified. Ensure that all calls to HandlePickedProxyMethod are updated accordingly.

Verification successful

No further action needed.

The method HandlePickedProxyMethod is only called within the same file where it is defined. There are no other occurrences in the codebase that need to be updated.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `HandlePickedProxyMethod` are updated accordingly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type cs 'HandlePickedProxyMethod'

Length of output: 335


215-215: Verify all function calls to HotExecute are updated accordingly.

The method body has been removed. Ensure that all calls to HotExecute are updated accordingly.


215-215: Verify all function calls to HandleToplevelNodes match the new signature.

The method signature has been changed. Ensure that all calls to HandleToplevelNodes are updated accordingly.

Verification successful

Verification successful: All calls to HandleToplevelNodes match the new signature.

The function call HandleToplevelNodes(file, root) matches the updated method signature HandleToplevelNodes(string file, CompilationUnitSyntax root).

  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `HandleToplevelNodes` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type cs 'HandleToplevelNodes'

Length of output: 342



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract the function call to `HandleToplevelNodes` and verify if it matches the new signature.

# Extract the line containing the function call and display it for verification.
rg --type cs 'HandleToplevelNodes' -A 0 -B 0

Length of output: 352


755-759: Verify all function calls to CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode are updated accordingly.

The method body has been modified. Ensure that all calls to CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode are updated accordingly.

Verification successful

Verify all function calls to CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode are updated accordingly.

The function calls to CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode are consistent with the new implementation. The surrounding code correctly handles the content parameter and the method's new logic based on project kinds is properly integrated.

  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor/HEProxy.cs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode` are updated accordingly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type cs 'CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode'

Length of output: 604



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract and review the lines of code around the function calls to `CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode` for thorough verification.

# Extract 5 lines before and after the function call to understand the context.
rg --type cs 'CreatePreprocessorConsoleWriteLineSyntaxNode' -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 4574


215-215: Verify all function calls to HandleTree match the new signature.

The method signature has been changed. Ensure that all calls to HandleTree are updated accordingly.


215-215: Verify all function calls to SetDefaultUsingCode are updated accordingly.

The method body has been removed. Ensure that all calls to SetDefaultUsingCode are updated accordingly.


215-215: Verify all function calls to Run are updated accordingly.

The method body has been removed. Ensure that all calls to Run are updated accordingly.

@@ -220,6 +212,7 @@ public static void Run()
Debug.WriteLine(root.ToFullString());
return GetOptimizationLevelNode(file, root, Encoding.UTF8);
}

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Ensure all calls to SetProjectKind are updated accordingly.

The method body has been removed, but calls to SetProjectKind still exist in HotExecutorGenerator.cs. This will lead to runtime errors if these calls are executed. Please update or remove these calls.

  • src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/HotExecutorGenerator.cs
Analysis chain

Verify all function calls to SetProjectKind are updated accordingly.

The method body has been removed. Ensure that all calls to SetProjectKind are updated accordingly.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `SetProjectKind` are updated accordingly.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg --type cs 'SetProjectKind'

Length of output: 623



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract lines around the calls to `SetProjectKind` in HotExecutorGenerator.cs
rg --type cs --context 5 'SetProjectKind' src/Natasha.CSharp/Extension/HotExecutor/Natasha.CSharp.HotExecutor.SG/HotExecutorGenerator.cs

Length of output: 1456

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant