Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC: Rename to dox-batcher (and maybe open source it?) #4

Closed
fgrehm opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

RFC: Rename to dox-batcher (and maybe open source it?) #4

fgrehm opened this issue Jan 16, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@fgrehm
Copy link
Contributor

fgrehm commented Jan 16, 2018

Reference https://github.com/doximity/doximity/pull/22781#discussion_r161814657

Any thoughts on that? I can submit it as a hack day idea

cc @jeyb @divoxx @benjaminoakes @jhicks @doximity/doc-news

@divoxx
Copy link
Member

divoxx commented Jan 16, 2018

Batcher is something we can potentially open source, it was built with that in mind.

We usually only add dox- prefix to things that are domain specific to Doximity, not general purposes library.

Maybe we should just pick up another name that is available?

@fgrehm
Copy link
Contributor Author

fgrehm commented Jan 16, 2018

Makes sense to me, just don't have any ideas :P

@benjaminoakes
Copy link

I peeked in a thesaurus and Bevy (unused) stood out...

@divoxx
Copy link
Member

divoxx commented Jan 17, 2018

I like the name but I think it doesn't communicate what the gem does.

What you think of case-packer? I don't really love this name specifically but I'm thinking about machines that packs together a case of beer (or anything, but mostly 🍺 😄), and I like the concept. Any suggestions along those lines?

@divoxx
Copy link
Member

divoxx commented Jan 19, 2018

I've renamed the project to batchmaker, it's available on rubygems. Any objections? @fgrehm @benjaminoakes

@divoxx divoxx closed this as completed Jan 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants