New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
INLINE_GROUPED_CLASSES=YES fails with GROUP_NESTED_COMPOUNDS=NO #10350
Comments
I also see problems with the other output formats.
|
Looks like the problem is introduced by:
though before the Might be related to #5445 and #5814 @doxygen any idea? |
@yuriishutkin Please verify if the referenced commit fixes the problem for you. Do not close the issue, this will be done automatically when the next official version is released. |
Confirm. It works fine now. |
This issue was previously marked 'fixed but not released', |
Describe the bug
If define INLINE_GROUPED_CLASSES=YES and there are nested classes inside a group, inconsistent refman.tex is generated - inner class apears in class documentation as a separate input entry but it is not generated. As a result latex fails.
Expected behavior
Nested classes inside a group with INLINE_GROUPED_CLASSES=YES do not appear as separated input entry in class documentation.
To Reproduce
Set INLINE_GROUPED_CLASSES=YES (keep GROUP_NESTED_COMPOUNDS=NO) and run the following file:
in refman.tex:
Manual setting
\ingroup test_group
for the inner class or setting GROUP_NESTED_COMPOUNDS=YES globally solves the issue but puts all nested compounds to the group class list that can be not intended.Version
1.9.8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: