You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.5.9 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
On 2009-08-04 08:39:22 +0000, Joachim Reichel wrote:
Please describe the problem:
Doxygen produces wrong output if there is a namespace of name 'internal'.
Steps to reproduce:
/// \file
/// internal namespace
namespace internal {
/// struct Foo
struct Foo {};
} // namespace internal
/// typedef Bar
typedef internal::Foo Bar;
Doxyfile: default of 1.5.9
Actual results:
Bar is listed as variable(!) without type and name "pad0".
Expected results:
That Bar gets documented as typedef to internal::Foo.
Does this happen every time?
Yes.
Other information:
The problem disappears if the namespace is renamed or "typedef internal" is replaced by "typedef ::internal". Similar if there is an outer namespace and "typedef internal" is replaced by "typedef outer::internal". The problem with the second workaround is that there is no warning/error and one has to search the documentation to detect these problems.
On 2009-08-04 09:15:56 +0000, Joachim Reichel wrote:
I should have added to the original report that the wrong output is on the "foo.cpp File Reference" page.
On 2009-08-14 12:47:41 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
Confirmed. Should be fixed in the next subversion update.
On 2009-08-20 10:12:52 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.6.0. Please verify if this is indeed the case and reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed (include any additional information that you
think can be relevant).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.5.9 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
On 2009-08-04 08:39:22 +0000, Joachim Reichel wrote:
On 2009-08-04 09:15:56 +0000, Joachim Reichel wrote:
On 2009-08-14 12:47:41 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
On 2009-08-20 10:12:52 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: