You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For example:
I have public class A and
private class B extends A.
When I generate documentation, class B - invisible. It's ok.
But in class A I receive string: "Inherited by B". It is not right, because B - is private and hidden in documentation.
If I add public class C extends A. The problem disappears.
On 2013-11-27 14:10:29 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
Created attachment 262941
Test private class B
On 2013-12-08 15:29:34 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
Confirmed. Should be fixed in the next GIT update.
On 2013-12-09 07:49:46 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
Thank you!
On 2013-12-24 19:00:06 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
This bug was previously marked ASSIGNED, which means it should be fixed in
doxygen version 1.8.6. Please verify if this is indeed the case. Reopen the
bug if you think it is not fixed and please include any additional information
that you think can be relevant (preferrably in the form of a self-contained example).
On 2013-12-25 15:28:02 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
Verified, it works correctly.
On 2013-12-26 08:45:37 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
Today I noticed one new fact.
By default, classes in Java have private visibility.
So, they should behave similarly to private class.
If we remove the word "private" before declaration class B in example files - the behavior should be the same. However, it is not so - reappearing "Inherited by B"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
status RESOLVED severity normal in component general for ---
Reported in version 1.8.5 on platform Other
Assigned to: Dimitri van Heesch
Original attachment names and IDs:
On 2013-11-27 14:09:35 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
On 2013-11-27 14:10:29 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
On 2013-12-08 15:29:34 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
On 2013-12-09 07:49:46 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
On 2013-12-24 19:00:06 +0000, Dimitri van Heesch wrote:
On 2013-12-25 15:28:02 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
On 2013-12-26 08:45:37 +0000, Volodymyr wrote:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: